References

Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: clinical practice guideline.Washington DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2009

Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: clinical practice guideline. In: Haesler E (Ed). Perth, Australia: Cambridge Media; 2014

Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: clinical practice guideline. The international guideline. In: Haesler E (Ed). : EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA; 2019

Deppisch M, Munoz N. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel root cause analysis toolkit.Washington DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2017

NPIAP Root Cause Analysis 3.0 toolkit. 2021. https://npiap.com/page/RCAToolkit (accessed 27 October 2022)

Black JM, Cuddigan JE, Walko MA Medical device related pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients. Int Wound J. 2010; 7:(5)358-365 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00699.x

Kayser SA, VanGilder CA, Ayello EA, Lachenbruch C. Prevalence and analysis of medical device-related pressure injuries: results from the international pressure ulcer prevalence survey. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2018; 31:(6)276-285 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000532475.11971.aa

Tang Z, Li N, Xu J. Construction of a risk prediction model for intraoperative pressure injuries: a prospective, observational study. J Perianesth Nurs. 2021; 36:(5)473-479 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2020.11.006

Bowie P, Skinner J, de Wet C. Training health care professionals in root cause analysis: a cross-sectional study of post-training experiences, benefits and attitudes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013; 13:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-50

Karkhanis AJ, Thompson JM. Improving the effectiveness of root cause analysis in hospitals. Hosp Top. 2021; 99:(1)1-14 https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2020.1824137

Hagley G, Mills PD, Watts BV, Wu AW. Review of alternatives to root cause analysis: developing a robust system for incident report analysis. BMJ Open Qual. 2019; 8:(3) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000646

Chung KC, Kotsis SV. Complications in surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129:(6)1421-1427 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ecda0

Black JM. Root cause analysis for hospital-acquired pressure injury. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019; 46:(4)298-304 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000546

Braithwaite J, Westbrook MT, Mallock NA Experiences of health professionals who conducted root cause analyses after undergoing a safety improvement programme. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15:(6)393-399 https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.017525

Abela G. Root cause analysis to identify contributing factors for the development of hospital acquired pressure injuries. J Tissue Viability. 2021; 30:(3)339-345 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2021.04.004

Deppisch M, Pittman J, Sieggreen M National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel root cause analysis toolkit 2.0.Westford MA: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2019

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Declines in hospital acquired conditions. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/2p8fdntf (accessed 27 October 2022)

Association of periOperative Registered Nurses. Prevention of perioperative pressure injury toolkit. https://tinyurl.com/5ynxy7k2 (accessed 27 October 2022)

National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators. Pressure injury training 8.0 – Module 4. 2021. https://tinyurl.com/muj2w43p (accessed 4 November 2022)

Perioperative pressure injury prevention: National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel root cause analysis toolkit 3.0

01 December 2022

Abstract

Objectives:

Operating room-related pressure injuries (ORPI) are particularly challenging to examine for several reasons. Time in the OR is often a distinct event within the hospitalisation, and discovery of an ORPI may occur between several hours and up to 5 days postoperatively. The National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) first developed a root cause analysis (RCA) toolkit in 2017 as a systematic strategy for investigating the root causes of facility-acquired pressure injury (PI). The purpose of this 2021 RCA toolkit update was to address an expanded investigation of medical device-related PIs (MDRPIs), both inside and outside the OR, as well as the specific PI prevention issues of the perioperative area.

Methods:

Clinicians have been using the 2017 toolkit as a basis for ongoing quality improvement tracking, since it provides more accurate information than data extractions from patient health records. A small working group consisting of NPIAP board and panel members developed investigative questions to identify the ORPI root causes and compliance with best practices for the entire perioperative experience.

Results:

Action items are linked to evidence-based recommendations from the NPIAP/European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel/Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance 2019 International Guideline and the Association of PeriOperative Registered Nurses (AORN) Guidelines for Perioperative Practice. A multidisciplinary clinician guide was also developed to identify practice gaps and to compile the information into an action plan for staff education and/or process improvement.

Conclusion:

The updated NPIAP RCA toolkit provides mechanisms for investigating, compiling and trending data as a basis for data-driven quality improvement. Using the enhanced investigative tools, the root causes of both MDRPIs and ORPIs can be better understood to target efforts to reduce their occurrence.

The National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) is an independent not-for-profit professional organisation dedicated to the prevention and management of pressure injuries (PI). Since 1986, NPIAP has been a leading voice in PI prevention and management through the development of educational materials, publication of white papers, support of research and public policy advocacy. In 2009, the NPIAP collaborated with the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) to publish Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: clinical practice guideline (CPG).1 The Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA) joined the NPIAP and EPUAP to develop the second edition in 2014.2 Using an explicit scientific methodology, the CPG (now in its third edition) provides evidence-based recommendations for the prevention and treatment of PIs for an international audience.3

However, PIs still occur, despite the best efforts of clinicians, and aetiologies are often multifactorial. In 2017, NPIAP developed and published a root cause analysis (RCA) toolkit based on the 2014 CPG to assist clinicians to determine root causes and develop effective quality improvement (QI) strategies. This original version of the toolkit covered the standard or non-surgical hospitalisation episode of care.4 In 2019, based on increased recognition of the perioperative-related PI within the continuum of care, NPIAP added an updated version of its RCA toolkit that included new perioperative-specific questions, new medical device-related pressure injury-specific questions and hyperlinks to relevant excerpts from the 2019 International Guideline for targeted education to support quality improvement activities.5

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Journal of Wound Care's World Union of Wound Healing Supplement and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for healthcare professionals. To read more, please register today.